Skip to main content

About your Search

20121006
20121014
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3
come into a hostile environment like st. louis is and you got to get one game. that's the important thing. we were able to get one last night. obviously you hate losing, but getting the first game was very important to split the series and head home, home field advantage. >> reporter: game three back in d.c. on wednesday at 1:07. edwin jackson gets the start for the nats. this is kind of ironing. he was with the cardinals last year -- ironic. he was with the cardinals last year and pitched in four postseason games for them. >> you at least have two more games in nationals farc. we're also monitoring the o's taking -- park. we're also moon toring the o's taking on that seer -- monitoring the o's taking on that sees up 2-1. >>> in northwest d.c. fans are still optimistic the nats will go all the way. take a listen. >> i definitely think they have a chance to win the world series. i wouldn't be surprised. >> i'm kind of taking it as it comes. i have tickets, so obviously i'm optimistic. >> they've got all the missing parts, great pitching, good bullpen and some great hitters, be nice
in the economic environment, is the fundamental reason that central planning cannot work, even apart from the adverse implications of central planning for individual freedom. we use market institutions to allocate resources because doing so maximizes aggregate wealth. we don't use market institutions to allocate and reallocate resources in order to preserve jobs in any given industry. therefore, the structural unemployment that results from reductions in defense outlays is irrelevant and politically, even if it is highly relevant politically. to the extent that reductions in defense outlays reflect an improvement in international security environments, that improvement in yields an increase in national wealth in exactly the same sense that a reduction in crime does the same. while increased employment in a given economic sector or increased unemployment, rather, in a given economic sector is painful for those subjected to economic losses, it is not a loss for the economy as a whole, because the reallocation of resources in response to changes in relative prices increases the aggregate pro
, because businesses and wall street needs clarity and direction and for some time it's been an environment of uncertainty. it's why you've seen stagnant in the employment numbers. gdp at 1.3%. the fed is keeping the interest rates very low now in order to make sure there's a backdrop for economic growth and expansion. we need fiscal leadership out of washington to basically say which way the economy will go. >> you mentioned wall street, what wall street doesn't like is uncertainty. but does wall street -- i think the traditional thinking is, well, wall street, when a republican is elected, they kind of like that, because they generally view that as being a pro business person in office. and generally a democrat bringing more regulation perhaps, which wall street might not like. is that a fair assumption? >> i would say so, to a certain degree. we need regulation, but not overregulation. if you look at a lot of surveys of the fortune 500 ceos now, a lot of them are saying there's too much regulation and there's more to come down the road with franks. franks will present five new government
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3